farm: were close to river

Property	Similarity
were close to river	1.00
were close to nile river	0.96
work better near river	0.89
be found near rivers	0.85
affect rivers	0.80

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(farm, were close to nile river)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(farm, were close to nile river)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(farm, were close to nile river)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(farm, be found near rivers)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(farm, affect rivers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(farm, affect rivers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(farm, be found near rivers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(farm, affect rivers)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(farm, be found near rivers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(farm, work better near river)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(farm, work better near river)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(farm, work better near river)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(farm, be found near rivers)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(farm, affect rivers)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(farm, were close to nile river)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(farm, were close to river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(farm, work better near river)

Parents	estate Weight: 0.64 , family Weight: 0.61 , real estate Weight: 0.60 , animal Weight: 0.59 , organization Weight: 0.58
Siblings	real estate agent Weight: 0.34 , breeder Weight: 0.34 , cattle Weight: 0.34 , llama Weight: 0.34 , mountain goat Weight: 0.33

farm: were close to river

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible