farmland: is good investment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.54
, land
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, commodity
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.33
, cemetery
Weight: 0.32
, soybean
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good investment 1.00
has trait investment 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(property, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(farmland, is good investment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(property, is good investment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(property, is good investment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(property, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(farmland, is good investment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(farmland, is good investment)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(farmland, has trait investment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(farmland, has trait investment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(farmland, has trait investment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(farmland, has trait investment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(farmland, is good investment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(farmland, is good investment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(property, is good investment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(farmland, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(property, is good investment)