fart: causes social dissaproval

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.66
, word
Weight: 0.56
, joke
Weight: 0.48
, sound
Weight: 0.45
, term
Weight: 0.43
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.35
, crap
Weight: 0.34
, ping pong
Weight: 0.34
, cunt
Weight: 0.34
, poop
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes social dissaproval 1.00
causes social embarrassment 0.81
causes social ostracism 0.79
causes social embarassment 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(fart, causes social dissaproval)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fart, causes social ostracism)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fart, causes social embarassment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fart, causes social ostracism)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fart, causes social embarrassment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fart, causes social ostracism)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fart, causes social embarrassment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fart, causes social embarrassment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(fart, causes social embarassment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fart, causes social embarassment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fart, causes social embarassment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fart, causes social embarrassment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fart, causes social ostracism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fart, causes social dissaproval)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fart, causes social dissaproval)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(fart, causes social dissaproval)