fart: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.66
, word
Weight: 0.56
, joke
Weight: 0.48
, sound
Weight: 0.45
, term
Weight: 0.43
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.35
, crap
Weight: 0.34
, hey
Weight: 0.34
, ping pong
Weight: 0.34
, cunt
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
good 0.86
feel good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fart, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(crap, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fart, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(oh, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ping pong, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(crap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(crap, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(oh, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cunt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cunt, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fart, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fart, good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fart, good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fart, good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(fart, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fart, feel good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fart, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(oh, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oh, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(crap, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cunt, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ping pong, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)