farting: is enjoyable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.50
, noise
Weight: 0.26
, nothing
Weight: 0.26
Siblings fart
Weight: 0.33
, poop
Weight: 0.32
, laughing
Weight: 0.32
, joke
Weight: 0.32
, dog poop
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is enjoyable 1.00
has trait fun 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nothing, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(farting, is enjoyable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nothing, has trait fun)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(nothing, has trait fun)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nothing, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(farting, is enjoyable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(farting, is enjoyable)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(farting, has trait fun)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(farting, has trait fun)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(farting, has trait fun)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(farting, has trait fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(farting, is enjoyable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(farting, is enjoyable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nothing, has trait fun)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(farting, is enjoyable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nothing, has trait fun)