fashion: was popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.64
, garment
Weight: 0.64
, celebrity
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, discipline
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lingerie
Weight: 0.35
, denim
Weight: 0.34
, dress
Weight: 0.34
, clothing
Weight: 0.33
, handbag
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was popular 1.00
is popular 0.95
was important to people 0.76
was important during renaissace 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(denim, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(clothing, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(clothing, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(clothing, is popular)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(lingerie, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lingerie, is popular)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(denim, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(denim, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fashion, was popular)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fashion, is popular)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fashion, is popular)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fashion, is popular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fashion, is popular)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(fashion, was important during renaissace)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fashion, was important to people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fashion, was important to people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fashion, was important during renaissace)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fashion, was important during renaissace)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fashion, was important to people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fashion, was important during renaissace)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fashion, was important to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fashion, was popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fashion, was popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lingerie, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(clothing, is popular)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fashion, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(denim, is popular)