fast food chain: be used to gain weight

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, product
Weight: 0.56
, business
Weight: 0.56
, employer
Weight: 0.55
, service
Weight: 0.47
Siblings fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.38
, food store
Weight: 0.38
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to gain weight 1.00
be used to put on weight 0.87
be used to gain wait 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to put on weight)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to put on weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to put on weight)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fast food chain, be used to gain weight)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to gain wait)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fast food chain, be used to gain wait)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to gain wait)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to gain wait)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to gain weight)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to gain weight)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to gain weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to put on weight)