fast food restaurant: be at big city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, junk food
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.85
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, hamburger
Weight: 0.66
, subway
Weight: 0.59
, diner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at big city 1.00
be at any large city 0.87
be at city 0.87
be at small town 0.81
be at town centre 0.78
be at town 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(place, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(food, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(place, be at town)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at town)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at big city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food, be at city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(place, be at city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at town)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(place, be at town)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at small town)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at small town)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at town)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(diner, be at small town)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(diner, be at small town)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fast food, be at small town)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at small town)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diner, be at city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(diner, be at city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(diner, be at town)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(diner, be at town)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be at big city)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be at city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be at town centre)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at town centre)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at town centre)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at town)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be at town)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at town)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at town)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at town centre)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(diner, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(diner, be at town)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(diner, be at small town)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fast food, be at small town)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)