fast food restaurant: is cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, junk food
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.85
, taco bell
Weight: 0.74
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, hamburger
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheap 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(junk food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(junk food, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is cheap)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(junk food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fast food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pizza, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pizza, is cheap)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(taco bell, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(junk food, is cheap)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheap)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, is cheap)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(taco bell, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(junk food, is cheap)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)