fast food restaurant: stop serving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, junk food
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.85
, taco bell
Weight: 0.74
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, hamburger
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
stop serving 1.00
serving breakfast 0.85
serve fish 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, stop serving)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(taco bell, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(taco bell, stop serving)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, stop serving)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, serve fish)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, serve fish)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, serve fish)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, serve fish)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, stop serving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, stop serving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, stop serving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(taco bell, stop serving)