fast food: be greasy

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be greasy 1.00
serve greasy over-priced meal 0.91
be fatty 0.78
taste salty 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fast food, be greasy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fast food, be greasy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(fast food, be greasy)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fast food, be fatty)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(fast food, be fatty)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be fatty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be greasy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fast food, be greasy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(fast food, be greasy)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, serve greasy over-priced meal)