fast food: become more popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
become more popular 1.00
become popular 0.96
is popular 0.86
is popular nowadays 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(food, become popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, become more popular)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, become more popular)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, become more popular)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(junk food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, become more popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(food, become popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(junk food, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is popular)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is popular)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, become popular)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(food, become popular)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(junk food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fast food, become more popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(chinese food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is popular)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hot dog, is popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is popular)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pizza, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pizza, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fast food, become more popular)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, is popular)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, is popular nowadays)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fast food, is popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, is popular nowadays)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fast food, is popular nowadays)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is popular nowadays)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, become more popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(food, become popular)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is popular)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese food, is popular)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hot dog, is popular)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pizza, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(food, become popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(fast food, become more popular)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is popular)