fat: be considered as energy compounds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.59
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, characteristic
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings animal fat
Weight: 0.62
, cream
Weight: 0.61
, shortening
Weight: 0.36
, sodium bicarbonate
Weight: 0.34
, protein
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as energy compounds 1.00
be considered energy compounds 0.99
be considered as high energy compounds 0.98
be considered high energy compounds 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fat, be considered as energy compounds)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fat, be considered energy compounds)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fat, be considered high energy compounds)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fat, be considered as high energy compounds)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fat, be considered energy compounds)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(fat, be considered high energy compounds)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fat, be considered high energy compounds)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fat, be considered as high energy compounds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fat, be considered as high energy compounds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fat, be considered high energy compounds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fat, be considered as high energy compounds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fat, be considered energy compounds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fat, be considered energy compounds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fat, be considered as energy compounds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fat, be considered as energy compounds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fat, be considered as energy compounds)