father: be protective of daughters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grandfather
Weight: 0.79
, brother
Weight: 0.76
, son
Weight: 0.74
, mother
Weight: 0.70
Siblings husband
Weight: 0.70
, basil
Weight: 0.59
, patriarch
Weight: 0.48
, eusebius
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protective of daughters 1.00
be more protective of daughters 0.99
protect daughters 0.90
be important to daughters 0.88
want daughters 0.85
hate daughters 0.85
be overprotective of daughters 0.85
love daughters 0.85
be mean to daughters 0.85
be more attached to daughters 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mother, be mean to daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(father, be protective of daughters)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mother, be mean to daughters)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mother, be mean to daughters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mother, be mean to daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(father, be protective of daughters)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(father, be more protective of daughters)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(father, be more protective of daughters)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(father, be more protective of daughters)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(father, protect daughters)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(father, protect daughters)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(father, protect daughters)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(father, be important to daughters)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(father, be important to daughters)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(father, be important to daughters)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(father, be more protective of daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(father, be mean to daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(father, be mean to daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(father, be overprotective of daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(father, be more attached to daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(father, be overprotective of daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(father, be mean to daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(father, be more attached to daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(father, be overprotective of daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(father, be more attached to daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(father, protect daughters)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(father, be important to daughters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(father, be mean to daughters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(father, be more attached to daughters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(father, be overprotective of daughters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(father, be protective of daughters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mother, be mean to daughters)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(father, be protective of daughters)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mother, be mean to daughters)