father: be treated like pay checks in family courts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grandfather
Weight: 0.79
, brother
Weight: 0.76
, son
Weight: 0.74
, mother
Weight: 0.70
Siblings husband
Weight: 0.70
, basil
Weight: 0.59
, stepfather
Weight: 0.51
, patriarch
Weight: 0.48
, eusebius
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated like pay checks in family courts 1.00
have pay 0.79
pay child support 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(father, have pay)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(father, pay child support)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(father, have pay)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(father, pay child support)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(father, pay child support)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(father, have pay)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(father, pay child support)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(father, have pay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(father, be treated like pay checks in family courts)