february: be 2nd groundhog day

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents act
Weight: 0.54
, month
Weight: 0.54
, date
Weight: 0.53
, day
Weight: 0.52
Siblings december
Weight: 0.56
, january
Weight: 0.55
, july
Weight: 0.34
, australia day
Weight: 0.34
, september
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be 2nd groundhog day 1.00
be called groundhog day 0.94
was 4th important day 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(july, was 4th important day)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(july, was 4th important day)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(july, was 4th important day)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(february, be 2nd groundhog day)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(february, be called groundhog day)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(february, be called groundhog day)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(february, be called groundhog day)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(february, be called groundhog day)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(february, be 2nd groundhog day)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(february, be 2nd groundhog day)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(february, be 2nd groundhog day)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(july, was 4th important day)