fed: be bad at red alert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.53
, player
Weight: 0.51
, regulator
Weight: 0.51
, body
Weight: 0.50
, financial institution
Weight: 0.49
Siblings feeding
Weight: 0.33
, fresh food
Weight: 0.30
, healthy
Weight: 0.29
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.29
, free will
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at red alert 1.00
be bad at tholian red alert 1.00
be bad at tholian alert 0.98
be bad at alert 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fed, be bad at red alert)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fed, be bad at alert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fed, be bad at tholian red alert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fed, be bad at tholian alert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fed, be bad at tholian red alert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(fed, be bad at tholian red alert)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fed, be bad at alert)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(fed, be bad at tholian alert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fed, be bad at alert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fed, be bad at tholian red alert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fed, be bad at tholian alert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fed, be bad at alert)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fed, be bad at tholian alert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fed, be bad at red alert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fed, be bad at red alert)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fed, be bad at red alert)