fee: be high on ticketmaster

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, charge
Weight: 0.62
, payment
Weight: 0.62
, deposit
Weight: 0.59
Siblings registration
Weight: 0.65
, admission
Weight: 0.63
, tuition
Weight: 0.62
, tax
Weight: 0.61
, camping
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high on ticketmaster 1.00
be on online tickets high 0.82
be on tickets high 0.81
be on online tickets 0.80
be on tickets 0.79
be at philips arena for concerts 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(admission, be at philips arena for concerts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(admission, be at philips arena for concerts)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(admission, be at philips arena for concerts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(fee, be high on ticketmaster)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fee, be on tickets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fee, be on online tickets high)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fee, be on tickets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fee, be on online tickets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fee, be on tickets high)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(fee, be on tickets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(fee, be on online tickets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fee, be on tickets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fee, be on tickets high)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fee, be on tickets high)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(fee, be on online tickets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fee, be on online tickets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fee, be on tickets high)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fee, be on online tickets high)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fee, be on online tickets high)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fee, be on online tickets high)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fee, be high on ticketmaster)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fee, be high on ticketmaster)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fee, be high on ticketmaster)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(admission, be at philips arena for concerts)