feedback: is important physiologically

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
Siblings preview
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, demo
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is important physiologically 1.00
be valuable in metabolic processes 0.76
be important in homeostasis 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(feedback, is important physiologically)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(feedback, be valuable in metabolic processes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(feedback, be valuable in metabolic processes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(feedback, be important in homeostasis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be valuable in metabolic processes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(feedback, be valuable in metabolic processes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(feedback, be important in homeostasis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be important in homeostasis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(feedback, be important in homeostasis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(feedback, is important physiologically)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(feedback, is important physiologically)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(feedback, is important physiologically)