feeling: have problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents joy
Weight: 0.68
, aspect
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
Siblings disappointment
Weight: 0.70
, loneliness
Weight: 0.69
, hope
Weight: 0.69
, fatigue
Weight: 0.69
, discomfort
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have problem 1.00
is problem 0.98
is bad thing 0.76
has state challenge 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hope, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hope, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hope, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(feeling, have problem)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(feeling, is problem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(feeling, is problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(feeling, is problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has state challenge)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(feeling, is bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(feeling, is problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(feeling, is bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(feeling, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(feeling, has state challenge)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(feeling, is bad thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(feeling, has state challenge)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(feeling, has state challenge)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(feeling, have problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(feeling, have problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hope, is bad thing)