female: be smarter then males

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents male
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, child
Weight: 0.55
, individual
Weight: 0.55
, victim
Weight: 0.54
Siblings sex ratio
Weight: 0.45
, woman
Weight: 0.35
, black
Weight: 0.33
, black cat
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be smarter then males 1.00
be smarter males 0.98
be much smarter than males 0.97
be better than males 0.91
be then males 0.87
love more than males 0.87
talk more than males 0.86
be less funny than males 0.86
be than males 0.86
live longer then males 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(female, be smarter then males)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(female, be much smarter than males)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(female, be much smarter than males)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(female, love more than males)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(female, be better than males)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(female, love more than males)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(female, be better than males)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(female, be much smarter than males)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(female, be much smarter than males)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(female, love more than males)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(female, be better than males)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(female, be better than males)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(female, love more than males)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(female, be smarter then males)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(female, be smarter then males)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(female, be smarter then males)