fencing: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.62
, security system
Weight: 0.59
, action
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, art
Weight: 0.55
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.33
, security guard
Weight: 0.33
, water polo
Weight: 0.32
, water sport
Weight: 0.32
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(art, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fencing, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(security system, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fencing, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fencing, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sport, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(security system, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(art, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(security system, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(art, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sport, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(archery, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(water polo, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(art, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fencing, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(security system, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fencing, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fencing, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(water polo, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(water polo, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(archery, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(archery, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(swimming pool, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(fencing, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fencing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sport, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(security system, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(art, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(archery, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(water polo, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(swimming pool, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sport, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(security system, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(fencing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(art, is expensive)