fiber optics: be important to doctors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.81
, technology
Weight: 0.73
, material
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.64
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.36
, lens
Weight: 0.35
, microwave
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to doctors 1.00
be used in surgery 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(laser, be used in surgery)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(laser, be used in surgery)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(laser, be used in surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laser, be used in surgery)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(laser, be used in surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laser, be used in surgery)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(fiber optics, be important to doctors)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, be used in surgery)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(fiber optics, be used in surgery)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be used in surgery)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be used in surgery)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be important to doctors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be important to doctors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(laser, be used in surgery)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be important to doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(laser, be used in surgery)