fiber optics: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.81
, technology
Weight: 0.73
, material
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.64
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.36
, lens
Weight: 0.35
, microwave
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lens, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(lens, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lens, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(fiber optics, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fiber optics, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, has quality better)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fiber optics, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fiber optics, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lens, has quality better)