fiber: be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optical fiber
Weight: 0.76
, shape
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.70
, bamboo
Weight: 0.69
, nylon
Weight: 0.67
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.64
, acetate
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting 1.00
is optic cables better 0.78
has physical part optic 0.78
be optic cable able 0.76
be optic cable 0.76
be optic cables 0.76
is optic cable 0.75
is optic cables 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fiber, has physical part optic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fiber, has physical part optic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fiber, is optic cable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(fiber, has physical part optic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(fiber, is optic cable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fiber, is optic cable)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is optic cable)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fiber, has physical part optic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fiber, be optic lighting better than traditional pool lighting)