fibrosis: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.54
, problem
Weight: 0.53
, condition
Weight: 0.49
, disease
Weight: 0.48
, feature
Weight: 0.48
Siblings cystic fibrosis
Weight: 0.36
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.35
, myocardial infarction
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.35
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
regard cross issues resolved 0.79
has state problem 0.78
regard cross issues resolved in workplace 0.78
regard cross issues 0.78
regard cross cultural issues resolved 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cystic fibrosis, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(atherosclerosis, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(fibrosis, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fibrosis, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(fibrosis, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fibrosis, has state problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fibrosis, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fibrosis, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fibrosis, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cystic fibrosis, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fibrosis, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, has state problem)