fiction: be considered classical hollywood cinema

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.63
, section
Weight: 0.56
, artist
Weight: 0.56
, element
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.54
Siblings science fiction
Weight: 0.74
, poetry
Weight: 0.35
, novel
Weight: 0.34
, literature
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered classical hollywood cinema 1.00
be considered hollywood cinema 0.97
is good genre 0.76
is genre 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, is genre)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(science fiction, is genre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(science fiction, is genre)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be considered hollywood cinema)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fiction, be considered hollywood cinema)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fiction, be considered hollywood cinema)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fiction, be considered hollywood cinema)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fiction, is genre)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fiction, is good genre)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fiction, is good genre)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(fiction, is good genre)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fiction, is good genre)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fiction, is genre)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fiction, is genre)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fiction, is genre)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be considered classical hollywood cinema) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(science fiction, is genre)