fiction: be great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.63
, section
Weight: 0.56
, artist
Weight: 0.56
, element
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.54
Siblings science fiction
Weight: 0.74
, poetry
Weight: 0.35
, novel
Weight: 0.34
, literature
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be great 1.00
has quality good 0.80
is best 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fiction, be great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(journal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(journal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(novel, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(poetry, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(fiction, be great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(poetry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(poetry, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(novel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(novel, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(fiction, be great)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fiction, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(fiction, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(fiction, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fiction, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fiction, is best)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fiction, is best)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(fiction, is best)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fiction, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fiction, be great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(poetry, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(novel, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fiction, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)