ficus: be at good health

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.72
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, shrub
Weight: 0.46
, variety
Weight: 0.37
, member
Weight: 0.28
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.38
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, maple tree
Weight: 0.38
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at good health 1.00
be at health 0.94
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(plant, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ficus, be at good health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(plant, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plant, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(plant, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at good health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ficus, be at good health)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ficus, be at health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ficus, be at health)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at good health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ficus, be at good health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(plant, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ficus, be at good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(plant, be good for environment)