fig: be good for constipation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, crop
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.57
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, peach tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear
Weight: 0.36
, grape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for constipation 1.00
help constipation 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for constipation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(pear, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for constipation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(fig, be good for constipation)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fig, help constipation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fig, help constipation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fig, help constipation)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fig, help constipation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fig, be good for constipation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fig, be good for constipation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fig, be good for constipation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pear, be good for constipation)