fig: split open

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, crop
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.57
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, peach tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear
Weight: 0.36
, grape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
split open 1.00
split on tree 0.77
burst open 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pear, split on tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pear, split on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pear, split on tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(fig, split open)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fig, split on tree)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(fig, burst open)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(fig, burst open)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fig, burst open)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fig, burst open)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fig, split on tree)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fig, split on tree)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fig, split on tree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fig, split open)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fig, split open)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fig, split open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pear, split on tree)