fighter: have small chests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plane
Weight: 0.63
, athlete
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, class
Weight: 0.59
Siblings boxer
Weight: 0.69
, wrestler
Weight: 0.57
, chuck
Weight: 0.54
, toby
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
have small chests 1.00
have thick necks 0.78
put ice on chest 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boxer, put ice on chest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boxer, put ice on chest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(boxer, put ice on chest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fighter, have small chests)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fighter, put ice on chest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fighter, put ice on chest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fighter, put ice on chest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fighter, have thick necks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(fighter, have thick necks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fighter, have thick necks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fighter, put ice on chest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fighter, have thick necks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fighter, have small chests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fighter, have small chests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fighter, have small chests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(boxer, put ice on chest)