finch: adapt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.57
, bird
Weight: 0.51
, songbird
Weight: 0.50
, band
Weight: 0.49
, visitor
Weight: 0.47
Siblings canary
Weight: 0.56
, chickadee
Weight: 0.45
, robin
Weight: 0.36
, zebra finch
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt 1.00
adapt on galapagos islands 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(species, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(finch, adapt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(species, adapt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(species, adapt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(species, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(finch, adapt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(finch, adapt)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(finch, adapt on galapagos islands)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(finch, adapt on galapagos islands)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(finch, adapt on galapagos islands)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(finch, adapt on galapagos islands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(finch, adapt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(finch, adapt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(species, adapt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(finch, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(species, adapt)