finger: be called bird

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents human hand
Weight: 0.63
, gesture
Weight: 0.63
, stylus
Weight: 0.61
, mark
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ring finger
Weight: 0.73
, index finger
Weight: 0.73
, thumb
Weight: 0.70
, middle finger
Weight: 0.70
, middle
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called bird 1.00
is bird 0.98
be concerned about owls 0.77
was in owl den 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, be called bird)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bird)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(middle finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(middle finger, be called bird)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(middle finger, is bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(middle finger, is bird)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(finger, be called bird)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(finger, is bird)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(finger, is bird)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(finger, is bird)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(finger, is bird)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(finger, be concerned about owls)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(finger, be called bird)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(finger, be called bird)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(middle finger, is bird)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(finger, be called bird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(middle finger, be called bird)