fingerprint: be considered unique

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evidence
Weight: 0.64
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.62
, signature
Weight: 0.59
, database
Weight: 0.58
Siblings handwriting
Weight: 0.34
, scanner
Weight: 0.34
, computer science
Weight: 0.33
, dna
Weight: 0.33
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered unique 1.00
be unique 0.91
is unique 0.91
be unique to person 0.85
be unique to individual 0.83
be considered individual 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(handwriting, is unique)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(dna, is unique)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(dna, is unique)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dna, is unique)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(handwriting, is unique)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(handwriting, is unique)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be considered unique)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be unique to person)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, is unique)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be considered individual)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be unique to individual)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be considered individual)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be considered individual)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered individual)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be unique to person)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be unique to individual)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fingerprint, is unique)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be unique to person)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be unique to individual)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, is unique)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fingerprint, is unique)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be unique to person)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be unique to individual)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered unique)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be considered unique)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(dna, is unique)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered unique)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(handwriting, is unique)