fingerprint: be used to uniquely identify individual

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evidence
Weight: 0.64
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.62
, signature
Weight: 0.59
, database
Weight: 0.58
Siblings scanner
Weight: 0.34
, computer science
Weight: 0.33
, dna
Weight: 0.33
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.33
, saliva
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to uniquely identify individual 1.00
be used to identify person 0.86
be unique to each individual include identical twin 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dna, be used to identify person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(dna, be used to identify person)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(dna, be used to identify person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be unique to each individual include identical twin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be unique to each individual include identical twin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be unique to each individual include identical twin)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be unique to each individual include identical twin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be used to uniquely identify individual)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dna, be used to identify person)