fingerprint: be useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evidence
Weight: 0.64
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.62
, signature
Weight: 0.59
, database
Weight: 0.58
Siblings handwriting
Weight: 0.34
, scanner
Weight: 0.34
, computer science
Weight: 0.33
, dna
Weight: 0.33
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful 1.00
be helpful in crime 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be useful)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be helpful in crime)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be helpful in crime)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be helpful in crime)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be helpful in crime)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fingerprint, be useful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)