fire department: have dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fire
Weight: 0.85
, department
Weight: 0.78
, city hall
Weight: 0.68
, city
Weight: 0.68
Siblings police department
Weight: 0.77
, firefighter
Weight: 0.64
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.42
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.42
, fire hose
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have dogs 1.00
have dalmatians 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, have dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, have dalmatians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(firefighter, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(firefighter, have dogs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(firefighter, have dalmatians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(firefighter, have dalmatians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(fire department, have dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fire department, have dalmatians)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(fire department, have dalmatians)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fire department, have dalmatians)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fire department, have dalmatians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fire department, have dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fire department, have dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(firefighter, have dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fire department, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(firefighter, have dalmatians)