firefighter: wear bright shiny suits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.65
, fire department
Weight: 0.64
, paramedic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ems
Weight: 0.44
, fireman
Weight: 0.38
, arsonist
Weight: 0.37
, police department
Weight: 0.36
, office worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear bright shiny suits 1.00
wear bright suits 0.97
wear shiny suits 0.97
wear suits 0.88
wear yellow 0.82
wear black 0.82
wear yellow shirts 0.81
wear red white suspenders 0.80
wear 0.79
wear yellow helmets 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(office worker, wear suits)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear yellow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(office worker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(office worker, wear suits)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fireman, wear yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(firefighter, wear yellow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(firefighter, wear yellow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(firefighter, wear yellow)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, wear yellow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(office worker, wear suits)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, wear bright shiny suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fireman, wear yellow)