fireman: dry hoses after fire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.64
, public servant
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
Siblings firefighter
Weight: 0.38
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.35
, office worker
Weight: 0.34
, plumber
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
dry hoses after fire 1.00
aiming fire hose 0.87
start fires 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, start fires)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(firefighter, start fires)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(firefighter, start fires)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fireman, dry hoses after fire)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fireman, aiming fire hose)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fireman, aiming fire hose)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fireman, aiming fire hose)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fireman, aiming fire hose)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fireman, start fires)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(fireman, start fires)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fireman, start fires)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fireman, start fires)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fireman, dry hoses after fire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fireman, dry hoses after fire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fireman, dry hoses after fire)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(firefighter, start fires)