fireman: is attractive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.64
, public servant
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
Siblings firefighter
Weight: 0.38
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.35
, office worker
Weight: 0.34
, plumber
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is attractive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fireman, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is attractive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fireman, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(construction worker, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fireman, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fireman, is attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fireman, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fireman, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fireman, is attractive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fireman, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fireman, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fireman, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(construction worker, is attractive)