firewall: be able

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.69
, network device
Weight: 0.67
, hardware
Weight: 0.62
, application
Weight: 0.62
Siblings gas pedal
Weight: 0.50
, computer network
Weight: 0.36
, router
Weight: 0.36
, server
Weight: 0.35
, security guard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be able 1.00
need managed 0.81
is allowed 0.78
need managed remotely 0.77
is managed 0.76
be supposed have 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hardware, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(firewall, be able)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hardware, be able)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be able)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(server, need managed remotely)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hardware, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(firewall, be able)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(server, need managed remotely) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(server, need managed remotely)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(firewall, be able)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be able)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(firewall, be able)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hardware, be able)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(server, need managed remotely)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(firewall, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hardware, be able)