firm: compete within perfectly competitive market considered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law firm
Weight: 0.81
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, member
Weight: 0.57
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.64
, vanguard
Weight: 0.58
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, renault
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
compete within perfectly competitive market considered 1.00
compete within perfectly competitive market 0.99
compete within competitive market considered 0.96
compete within competitive market 0.95
compete within market considered 0.94
compete within market 0.93
compete 0.82
engage in price competition 0.79
compete for rankings 0.77
enter market 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(law firm, compete for rankings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(law firm, compete for rankings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(law firm, compete for rankings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(law firm, compete for rankings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(firm, engage in price competition)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(firm, engage in price competition)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(firm, engage in price competition)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(firm, engage in price competition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(law firm, compete for rankings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(firm, compete within perfectly competitive market considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(law firm, compete for rankings)