fish: be at be small

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, wildlife
Weight: 0.63
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.74
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.73
, catfish
Weight: 0.72
, sailfish
Weight: 0.72
, seahorse
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at be small 1.00
wants to eat small fish 0.79
school in large group 0.78
be defined as large fish 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, be defined as large fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(whale shark, be defined as large fish)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(whale shark, be defined as large fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fish, be at be small)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fish, wants to eat small fish)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fish, school in large group)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(fish, school in large group)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fish, school in large group)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fish, school in large group)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fish, wants to eat small fish)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fish, wants to eat small fish)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fish, wants to eat small fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at be small)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fish, be at be small)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at be small)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(whale shark, be defined as large fish)