fish: be at bottom of sea

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, wildlife
Weight: 0.63
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.74
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.73
, catfish
Weight: 0.72
, sailfish
Weight: 0.72
, seahorse
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bottom of sea 1.00
be at sea 0.88
be fish from sea 0.84
live very deep in sea 0.83
requires go to river or sea 0.82
be at in ocean 0.82
be find in ocean 0.81
be at ocean 0.81
be at any ocean 0.79
requires find lake or ocean 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creature, be at sea)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at any ocean)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creature, be at sea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(creature, be at ocean)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(creature, be at any ocean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at any ocean)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at sea)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at ocean)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at any ocean)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at sea)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, be at ocean)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, be at sea)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, be at ocean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creature, be at sea)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at any ocean)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(seahorse, be at sea)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(seahorse, be at sea)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(catfish, be at sea)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at sea)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(seahorse, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(seahorse, be at ocean)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(whale shark, be at ocean)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(whale shark, be at ocean)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(catfish, be at any ocean)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at any ocean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fish, be at bottom of sea)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fish, be at sea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fish, be at sea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fish, be at in ocean)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fish, be at sea)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fish, be at sea)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at sea)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at sea)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fish, be at in ocean)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in ocean)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fish, be at sea)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fish, be at sea)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fish, be at in ocean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(creature, be at sea)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(creature, be at ocean)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(creature, be at any ocean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(seahorse, be at sea)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(catfish, be at sea)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(seahorse, be at ocean)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(whale shark, be at ocean)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catfish, be at any ocean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(creature, be at sea)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(creature, be at ocean)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fish, be at bottom of sea)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(creature, be at any ocean)