fish: be fry and on my plate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, wildlife
Weight: 0.63
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.74
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.73
, catfish
Weight: 0.72
, sailfish
Weight: 0.72
, seahorse
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fry and on my plate 1.00
be at fry pan 0.85
be at plate 0.85
be cook on grill 0.79
causes you catch fish for dinner 0.79
be used to catch fish to eat 0.77
causes have fish for dinner 0.77
be eat cook 0.76
wants to eat small fish 0.76
causes you catch some fish 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at plate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(catfish, be at plate)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at plate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(fish, be fry and on my plate)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at fry pan)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fish, be at fry pan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fish, wants to eat small fish)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fish, be at fry pan)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fish, be at fry pan)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fish, wants to eat small fish)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fish, wants to eat small fish)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fish, wants to eat small fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fish, be fry and on my plate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fish, be fry and on my plate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fish, be fry and on my plate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(catfish, be at plate)