fish: have scales

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.65
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings rainbow trout
Weight: 0.84
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.79
, sturgeon
Weight: 0.79
, walleye
Weight: 0.78

Related properties

Property Similarity
have scales 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fish, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rainbow trout, have scales)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fish, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rainbow trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rainbow trout, have scales)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fish, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(fish, have scales)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(fish, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fish, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fish, have scales)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fish, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fish, have scales)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fish, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rainbow trout, have scales)