fishing rod: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fishing
Weight: 0.80
, rod
Weight: 0.73
, hunting
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.40
, bait
Weight: 0.35
, reel
Weight: 0.35
, walleye
Weight: 0.34
, sinker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is cheap 0.79
is more popular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rod, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fishing, is more popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rod, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fishing, is more popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is more popular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rod, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(walleye, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(reel, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rod, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fishing, is more popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(walleye, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(walleye, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(reel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reel, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fishing rod, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rod, is cheap)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fishing, is more popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(walleye, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(reel, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rod, is cheap)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fishing rod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fishing, is more popular)