fishing: be like pond

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like pond 1.00
be like pond dipping 0.87
is lake 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(canoe, is lake)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing, be like pond)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(canoe, is lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canoe, is lake)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(canoe, is lake)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fishing, be like pond)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fishing, be like pond)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(fishing, be like pond dipping)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be like pond dipping)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fishing, be like pond dipping)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fishing, be like pond dipping)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be like pond)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing, be like pond)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(canoe, is lake)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing, be like pond)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(canoe, is lake)