fishing: be to coral reefs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to coral reefs 1.00
affect coral reefs 0.99
destroy coral reefs 0.98
affect marine turtles 0.82
affect creatures fish etc in sea 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fishing, be to coral reefs)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fishing, destroy coral reefs)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fishing, destroy coral reefs)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fishing, destroy coral reefs)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fishing, destroy coral reefs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fishing, affect coral reefs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect coral reefs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fishing, affect marine turtles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(fishing, affect marine turtles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect marine turtles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fishing, affect marine turtles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(fishing, affect coral reefs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fishing, affect coral reefs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to coral reefs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fishing, be to coral reefs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to coral reefs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea)